It's been an oft discussed issue: the lack of women in executive management positions in the technology industry. I don't really have an answer to this other than to say the industry in general has to mature a bit because the go-go-go and vaguely frat boy culture of most technology organizations makes them unappealing to lead for many women. I think, for that reason, a lot of women choose not to take part in the management of them, regardless of how well qualified they are. It's mostly a cultural, not an expertise issue from my perspective. I believe culture creates far more difficult barriers to change than anything else in organizations - and it is mostly un-articulated and not proactively considered or facilitated in so many companies.
But women are obviously in the tech industry and a recent TechCrunch article Why Women Rule the Internet really bothered me because it was quite focused on the opportunity for women in online shopping. While that is an opportunity, there is so much more - and so many more important aspects of the technology market - that women are also involved with. But the leadership challenges remain.
Having gone to one of the Seven Sister colleges what I know is that a hugely disproportionate percentage of leaders in politics and other industries are graduates of women's colleges. Women's college graduates:
- Make up 1/3rd of female board members of the Fortune 1000
- Are twice as likely to earn Ph.Ds
- Are 20% of women in Congress
But women's college graduates only make up only about 2-4% of all women graduates. Clearly while women can receive a great education at many places, these schools do a better job at preparing women for leadership positions.
The problem with women's leadership in technology? Women's colleges like my own Alma Mater, Mount Holyoke, have been almost completely absent from the discussion despite educating Jean Sammet who helped develop FORMAC and Susan Kare who designed the first Macintosh graphics.
Traditionally, computer engineering and information technology has not been seen as a liberal arts discipline but with the advent of socially mediated technology as well and its ubiquity in everything we do, I think it is high time that women's colleges took on the challenge of educating and preparing women for leadership positions in technology. In fact, another recent TechChrunch article spoke about the need for both engineering and liberal arts backgrounds to be represented in order to build world class technical solutions and stated that only 37% of technology executives and heads of product have engineering degrees. This jives with my experience that only a portion of executives in the technology companies I've worked for come from engineering.
So where are the women's colleges in this field? Mount Holyoke, I'm looking at you.


I have to give a shout out to my school, Sweet Briar College. Since I graduated I've watched with interest as they launched an engineering program, offering a BS in Engineering Science and a BA in Engineering management. It's a new program, but I'm tremendously proud of the steps they've taken to get this off the ground, including a summer program for high school girls.
This year also saw the launch of an ipad pilot program http://www2.newsadvance.com/news/2010/sep/18/apple-teacher-and-students-ar-511944/ and renovations to one of the class rooms to bring it up to modern technological standards.
All of these efforts makes me very happy and proud to have graduated from such a forward thinking women's college. I think we're on the right track to shape women into leaders in the technology fields.
Posted by: Jenmontfort | March 22, 2011 at 10:10 PM
Funny--I started drafting a blog post after reading that same TechCrunch article. I'm so tired of articles claiming that women rule...well, mostly anything, because invariably they really don't. Unless the definition of "ruling" is spending money. They don't earn equivalent wages in many/most sectors. Etc. I'll save the rant for my own post and spare you and your readers ;)
But cool point about women's colleges. I applied to three schools back in the day, two of which were women's schools (one of which was Sweet Briar--cool comment about it above!). I got into all three, but chose the coed one. I wonder if my life would be any different today had I chosen one of the other two?
Posted by: Maggielmcg | March 23, 2011 at 08:06 AM
Jen, that is very cool - CV Harquail also shared this article about Bryn Mawr: http://nyti.ms/dWGwFM
Engineering programs are a start and one prong of the need but I also think it could be elevated to a cross-institute initiative on technology leadership that included placement of interns, management of technology, a tie to sociology & psychology, etc.
Maggie - that was very much my annoyance with the article as well. Um, well, until women are reaping the benefits of all that spending on the other side they are really just providing all the economic juice but not getting the economic benefit. So how does that constitute 'ruling'. Even after having gone to a women's college is is hard for me to explain why they are SO instrumental in developing leadership although I will say taking a class at Amherst opened my eyes. Only two women spoke the entire semester (me and another women) and the other women got shot down repeatedly and the male professor did nothing to mediate. If every class I took had been like that, I probably would have become a lot less vocal too.
Posted by: Rhappe | March 23, 2011 at 09:09 AM
Hi Rachel,
What I found remarkable about the stats you cited was that they shed convincing light on an old debate about women's-only vs coed schools. Frankly, I was always of the opinion that a hothouse flower wouldn't do very well when it had to go outside in the cold. But apparently this is not the case!
But tell me, is it only the Seven Sisters that do this well? That would tend to argue more for the Ivy or old-patrician-girl effect rather than the women's school effect.
Posted by: twitter.com/JoeCascio | May 04, 2011 at 08:27 AM
Joe -
They are interesting stats and I believe they are for women's colleges generally but I don't know that for a fact... I'd have to do some digging.
It's a slightly strange phenomenon that I can't quite explain although I will say I took a class at Amherst while at Mount Holyoke and was a bit shocked by how domineering the men in the class were, and the complacency of the instructor - if that is what high end co-ed colleges are like generally, it would be tough for women to even find their public voice - never mind use it actively. But that is only one data point.
Posted by: Rhappe | May 04, 2011 at 10:08 AM