With the exploding number of modes of communication channels, do you understand how and how often your customers are being contacted? Marketing departments do a pretty good job of tracking prospects via website hits, webinars, & conferences...and CRM systems track communications that employees choose to synch with them, but that has pretty high overhead so it is likely that only formal correspondence gets tracked. But what about IM, what about Facebook, what about blogs & comments, what about Twitter, what about LinkedIn? What about all those short calls and emails that collectively demonstrate a close relationship but individually are not worth registering?
Increasingly the customers that your employees have the closest relationship with are 'unseen' by the company because they cross-over between business and personal and the communications happen outside of the formal channels... and that should be encouraged, but you should also know about it as it represents both opportunity and risk to your business.
The other issue is that people are increasingly overwhelmed with all the channels of communications available and it is left largely to individuals to decide for themselves how to interact with business partners. But how people choose to interact may have significant implications for how the relationship develops and then is maintained. And what if your marketing, sales, and support organizations are all choosing different methods? That then makes customers have dramatically different experiences across their lifetime with your company...which is a huge risk because if they are given communications (and therefore relationship) expectations by marketing that are not played out once they are customers, they will likely be unhappy.
The question I have for companies is: Do your communications with various constituent bases align with your business strategy? Do you formally train or encourage employees to interact is specific ways with specific audiences...or are you just scrambling to try to use everything available without much thought as to whether that really supports your strategy? Twitter is not for everyone...but neither is email. It all depends what kind of relationship you need to achieve your business goals.
Think about it...and then figure out whether the communications that are happening really supports your strategy. Social network analysis and other tools can help figure out what is happening in your company today - and give you a good idea of what might need to be better aligned. This is particularly critical if you are restructuring and reorganizing as customers often are often the unintended victims of upheaval.

The Social Organization is brilliant. Spot on.
Posted by: Thomas Power | January 30, 2009 at 01:39 AM
An interesting point, and I do think being addressed by some of the players in this space, check out the new Service Cloud from salesforce.com and the SocialCRM initiatives from Oracle .. Both very interesting..
Oracle SocialCRM: http://www.oracle.com/socialcrm/index.html
sfdc: http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9126021&source=rss_topic62
Posted by: Nigel Walsh | January 30, 2009 at 01:53 AM
Hi Thomas & Nigel - Thanks for stopping by and for the links. The CRM companies are extending their reach to pull in information from Facebook and others.
I do have some questions about the approach - i.e. do users know that their personal information is being mined by corporate CRM systems and how do they feel about that? Are traditional customer service agents empowered enough to make this approach successful?
It will definitely be interesting to see how it all plays out!
Posted by: Rachel Happe | January 30, 2009 at 07:09 AM
Brands still don't understand the importance of getting the model of trust right. The reality is that they themselves must become like networks in order to truly understand how to exploit other networks. http://winningbysharing.typepad.com/oaxaca/2008/03/the-value-of-so.html
Posted by: Oaxaca | January 30, 2009 at 10:26 AM