I love that Twitter has 140 characters. Love, love, love it. Why?
People abuse emails in so many ways:
- Going on and on and on. Unless it is something I am directly responsible for, taking 15 minutes to read an email is not something I am going to prioritize. What can be communicated in 2 minutes over the phone takes me 300% longer to read and I may mis-understand the email after all of that.
- Everyone gets cc'd - this means I really won't pay attention to the tome.
- The action needed is typically buried somewhere in the middle of the email
- Email is used for conversations that should really be had in person - it encourages dysfunctional passivity and political maneuvering that usually only obfuscates the issue.
I've had a couple of interesting conversations recently with multiple people over multiple channels (some are Twitterers, some are not). The non-Twitter conversation is much more involved and I suppose some of that context is useful - but it sure isn't quick. The Twitter side of my conversation - short and to the point.
In an era of information overload, I appreciate the ability to zero in to the heart of the matter. As my example here shows, you can actually get a lot of information in - and link to anything that is supporting information.
My suggestion: Even if you don't Twitter - try limiting your emails to 140 characters for a week. If it is longer than that, pick up the phone, stop by someone's office, or provide back up information via a link.
Short is definitely sweet.


Would be interesting if your mail program stopped showing what you typed after 140 characters. My bet is most people will be rewriting emails 10 times. :)
Posted by: Mukund Mohan | April 22, 2008 at 09:36 PM
Hi Mukund - Thanks for stopping by!
There are definitely things that need to be longer...and email is indeed useful for some of those things - my point is really to think about how we can all be more succinct and, with it, more effective.
Posted by: Rachel Happe | April 23, 2008 at 07:49 AM
Rachel,
Nice post. I particularly like your last bullet-- and would add that the passive emailers often assume the email has been read. Hilarity (or tragedy) often ensues.
Posted by: Doug Haslam | April 23, 2008 at 01:15 PM
Hear, hear.
I would add: When trying to coordinate schedules, don't say: "When is a good time?" but propose several options. At first it might feel pushy or bossy, but I find that people are grateful for clarity, efficiency, and brevity.
Posted by: Beth Dunn | April 23, 2008 at 06:25 PM
Hi Doug & Beth -
Couldn't agree more - thanks for the additions!
Rachel
Posted by: Rachel Happe | April 23, 2008 at 09:00 PM